An inverted job search
I realise I've shared this chapter fairly recently, but there's good reason to revisit it.
On Friday, I launched a new AI tool - Your Job Search Plan. You can find it here:
https://your-jobsearch-plan.netlify.app/
It's based on the inversion principle below: the optimal job search is an inversion of how that job is optimally recruited.
In other words, the first step in a job search should be to understand how recruiters and hiring processes seek to fill your ideal vacancy.
Then to access all those channels while putting your best foot forward.
It connects your applications, your networking, your CV, your LinkedIn profile, and so on, all of which should stem from your professional identity, the context of your career, the market conditions for that career, and therefore the work you'll need to do to boost your odds.
One thing I'm pleased about with this tool is how it relates to the other tools and resources on www.bwrecruitment.co.uk/resources.
So what seemed abstract, or painful activities without guaranteed outcome, become a practical arrow in the quiver of your search.
I hope you find these tools helpful. They are a starting point, rather than a resolution.
20 - An inverted job search
So, your broad approach to looking for a job is based on a product marketing strategy.
How does this link to your job search and how companies hire?
The next step is to recognise a job search is an inverted recruitment process.
Whatever you can learn about the actual workings of recruitment, the better armed you are to navigate them.
The first way in which this is true is around the routes to market employers take to fill a job.
Employers want to fill vacancies in the most economical and efficient means possible.
Sometimes they’ll rely on external advice, sometimes they’ll figure out their own way, and sometimes they’ll employ people to do it for them (such as a Talent Acquisition Manager or internal recruiter).
When they rely on external advice, it may not surprise you it’s as varied and contradictory as job seeker advice.
Take this nugget of wisdom:
80% of suitable candidates are not actively looking for work. By advertising, you’ll only have access to the 20% that applies to adverts.
Hang on a minute! Doesn’t that sound an awful lot like the hidden jobs market?
Of course, candidates aren’t hidden - much like hidden jobs, the priority is to understand the channels through which candidates are found.
These channels directly mirror the channels through which you look for that job:
Job boards; LinkedIn; Recruitment agencies; Confidential headhunting; Internal promotions; Secondments; Temp-to-perm hires; Consulting-to-perm hires; Referrals; Networking; Speculative approaches; Careers pages; Talent pools; Candidate databases
Every job is different, dictated by principles like supply and demand, confidentiality, reputational risk, wherewithal, budget and capacity.
The hiring process of a Software Developer is different from that of a Sales Director.
If an employer only hires through an advert - this means if you don’t apply for adverts, there’s no way in which you can be considered for that vacancy.
A second way it’s accurate is the notion that what’s true for one may not be true for others. This relates to candidate resentment.
You may read online that some recruitment behaviours are signs of a bad employer.
Yet, you should always follow the instructions given when applying for an advert or through an agency.
They may instruct you to:
1/ Write a CV, cover letter and duplicate it on their ATS
2/ Tell them your salary when they don’t list theirs
3/ Do 17 interviews before reaching a decision
4/ Deliver a 6-month strategy plan by presentation
5/ Or any other request deemed unreasonable by Career Coaches, Job seekers, or people otherwise uninvolved in that process
What some consider red flags, others will deem acceptable practice.
It becomes your choice to play the game or not. Either follow their instructions or step away. You don’t have to apply if you don’t want to.
In a similar vein, if you hear a hiring process has a preference, or if there are gaps in their employment armoury - these might be biases you can lean into.
The hiring manager loves Arsenal Football Club and is biased towards people who love the same? Now might be the time to switch allegiance, if you can fake it or make it.
They love a one page CV? Apply with a one page CV.
You know the hiring manager of an advert with 400 applications? Give them a call - they might give you an unfair advantage.
Poor practice from the employer, yet these are problems you can turn into opportunity.
A third way in which this is true is by comparing inbound and outbound activity
Outbound activity is where you go to your prospect (phone calls, messaging).
Inbound activity is where the prospect comes to you (job adverts, content).
Yet an outbound activity for a recruiter is an inbound activity for you (you receive phone calls and messages).
While an inbound activity has you getting in touch because of their advert or content.
When we talk about optimising your work, whether your CV, profile or interviews, it has to give the process what it needs.
How can you be more discoverable, so you receive more relevant calls and messages?
How can you improve your return on applications and your outbound messages?
What about inverse non-recruitment?
A brilliant, if strange question, with the same answer.
When networking, going direct, seeking to become a referral, doorknocking, or other, what is the inverse of that activity?
How does that person find or recommend people, if they become aware of a vacancy? How might they see you as a person to solve their problems, even if it isn’t a vacancy?
You do these activities because of how they might help you and because of the benefit the other party experiences. What’s in it for them?
If there isn’t anything in it for them, why should they help you?
For each and every stage in recruitment, there is an opposed force, as candidates and the hiring process meet each other. It’s rarely an equal force, because every vacancy has supply and demand, resource, skill level, biases and intent at play.
This is why each type of role has a different method of looking for work.
Executive vacancies typically prioritise headhunted candidates, with fewer public adverts. Here the priority shifts towards building relationships with, and being discoverable by, Executive Search recruiters.
If executives rely mainly on job boards, they may never think to focus on more suited channels.
If you can learn what the other needs for that process to be successful, you can deliver the same.
Speak to peers, speak to hiring managers you know, speak to recruiters, speak to former job seekers. How have they found work, and how would they recruit for your roles?
Research your market to find viable employers, to identify recruiters and to build your network.
Then execute an appropriate strategy to access these channels.
