On job offers

Greg Wyatt • October 30, 2024

This article covers the following, in service of considering whether a job offer you’ve received is the right move:

  • Identity

  • Total compensation

  • Opportunity cost

  • Impact

  • Culture & People

  • ikigai (not Ikigai)

Let’s get into it.

Identity

At the start of any job search, I recommend establishing what your career identity is.

This may be at the point of an unexpected redundancy, when you’ve decided your current job is no longer right, or even if a recruiter contacts you out of the blue with a compelling proposition.

I also recommend you do this once a year, even when gainfully employed, because it’s easy for the path of employment to diverge from where you want your career to go.

It’s simple really, and goes back to basics with key questions.

  • What’s your current context personally, with family, in life? What do you need and how does work reflect this?

  • What are your core values? The ones that underpin who you are, and who you want to see in the mirror. How does work reflect this?

  • What are the things you enjoy, are neutral about, or dislike in your career? What does this look like in your current job?

  • How has the company changed in the past year? How has the world changed? How does this reflect you as a person?

  • Who do you want to be as a person, family member, friend and peer?

  • What impact do you want to make?

  • How much do you need to earn and by when?

These answers aren’t fixed and can change quickly with a change in circumstance, as you change over time, or for reasons out of your control.

It’s a good idea to establish what you want and what you need, and therefore what this looks like in your next job.

If you find yourself out of work, and with bills to pay, one answer might be to take a job stacking the shelves at night, so you can look for work during the day.

Or you may have cash in the bank and can afford to wait for the right role, rather than any role.

There’s no one right answer, but there are answers that you can find for yourself.

This identity informs your job search strategy, part of which is the roles you go for, part of which is the approach you take, and part of which is what an acceptable job offer looks like for you.

Total compensation & opportunity cost

It's common to see salary as the most important factor in a job offer negotiation.

However, it's better to look at negotiating total compensation and opportunity cost.

Total compensation is the overall financial value of a role. It includes things like:

Salary
Pension contribution
Bonus
Commission
Car allowance
RSUs

Some benefits are salary sacrificed or tax efficient - their value goes beyond what they appear on paper.

For example a great pension scheme will save you 20% or 40% on tax payments in the UK across the salary invested. It might even, at a higher salary level, improve access to child benefits.


Conversely opportunity cost is the consequence of taking an offer, compared to what you might have if you stayed.

For example:

Moving to a three-day hybrid, compared to full remote. What's the cost of mileage, and time travelling? What's the cost of heating your home when fully remote?

Or - a role that offers more money now, but no progression in future. Vs a role that pays less now, but will leapfrog in future, while giving you skills that support career growth. Are these contractual, things that are likely to happen, or empty promises - look for evidence such as a track record with other employees.

It's entirely possible to accept an offer with a higher salary, yet find yourself worse off with take home pay.

Consider all the financial implications of an offer.

Impact

Impact goes both ways. The impact you can have in your new role, and the impact your new role will have on you.

Important to understand both against your career identity.

A high paying job that takes you away from a young family might be a solution or a problem.

A brilliant job that’s an unsustainable commute won’t work long term. Does that matter to you?

A well paid job that gives you a good balance at home, yet will only be a cog in a machine - a dream for some, unfulfilling for others.

Impact also includes trajectory. Are you someone who wants to do the same job over time, in a structured way? Someone who wants regular advancement and career development?

Both, and others are fine. Make sure you know what you are getting yourself into.

Culture & People

It’s at least partly true that people leave bosses, not jobs.

While decent people can become bad bosses for various reasons, some of which relate to the environment they manage within.

The problem is that people are on their best behaviour in interview processes, while culture as it’s pitched doesn’t always reflect the culture experienced.

The interview process should be there for you to establish this as much as possible.

But it’s also a good idea to do your own research, to get a sense of a company’s values, principles, how it treats its people, and all those other elements that will affect a career with them.

This is research to be done at interview stage, even before. These points may help.

Click on the link right above for why I differentiate.

Ikigai (with a little i) is a great Japanese concept. In its original form it means ‘what you get out of bed for’ or ‘those small moments we take pleasure in’.

Rather than the westernised Venn Purpose Diagram many are familiar with as Ikigai (with a big I). Indeed, if you ask people in Japan what they think of Ikigai they may well say something along the lines of “huuunnhh?”

This ikigai is an important principle in job offer.

It’s those qualities unique to you (often defined by your career identity) that you take pleasure in, while others around you may not get it.

Sometimes this is gut instinct. Important to listen to, important to challenge.

It’s at least part of your decision in a job offer.

Everything else might be just alright, but there’s an ikigai in your job offer that might be good reason to take it.

For example, I’d stack shelves at night, while looking for work, if it meant it paid the bills and supported my family. That’s not something to be ashamed of - that’s my ikigai.

Or it might be the company’s purpose and what they are doing to improve the world.

ikigai is unique to you, and it makes everything better if you can find it.

Those are the key points I’d consider if given a job offer.

There’s no right or wrong, only right for you and the people you support.

Thanks for reading.

Regards,

Greg

p.s. please share this article with your fellow job seekers. LinkedIn has decided this substack is, at least for now, harmful content and removes links to it. Frustrating when I try to share it in posts, with contacts, or in declining applications.

Introduction to personal branding

By Greg Wyatt • March 30, 2026
What follows is Chapter 39 of A Career Breakdown Kit (2026) . It's 10 months old, so surely the algorithm has moved on right? Indeed, my own content performance has tanked if you compare 2026 to 2025. Around 12 million views of my content last year, while if I extrapolate my year to date performance, it looks like a little shy of 640,000 views. My LinkedIn feed is quieter, yet real life relevant conversations go from strength to strength, many of which stem from my content. Look, I don't love the term, but I am a fan of putting your message out there, across multiple means, so that your most relevant audience might become aware of you. And perhaps your relevant audience is an audience of one, a person who can put you nearer that job. Which is the only algorithm you need. This is a three part series, with part 2 on " Content strategy and philosophy " and part 3 on " A flair post ". Click on the links for the unedited versions on Substack. 39 - Introduction to personal branding Whatever you think of LinkedIn, you shouldn’t overlook its nature as a free marketing platform, where you can build a reputation through the words of your posts, comments and messages. Personal branding is a viable tactic as part of a multi-channel approach to your job search and it can bring opportunities to you. I'll start off by saying I'm not a fan of the term personal branding. It can lead to make-work which can even get in the way of what you should be doing. Writing and using content to create experiences that support a job search is a great idea and calling it personal branding - as a discrete activity - isn’t a bad thing. I expect there are many mediums through which you can build a personal brand. I'll focus on LinkedIn because of how entrenched it is in other job search activities. What a personal brand is For businesspeople the idea is that by building awareness of your personality, lifestyle and what you're promoting, you also build trust. So that when people are ready to buy, they'll buy your products. The brand might be personal. The goal is sales. When you see personal branding on LinkedIn it’s often a business that promotes their services through the account of the author. ‘Here’s my puppy, buy my stuff.’ Take note that the target audience for these advice posts is the businesspeople above. And these posts often seek to part them from their money. Your goals are similar. If there’s a commercial outcome you want, it’s likely a single job, not a throughput of leads. You’ll also see that controversial content gets huge engagement and can also repel readers. If you need a job, what’s the danger of writing overly spicy content? Could a reader make a decision against you based on your words? How much you need any job should inform the experience you want to create for your readers. How it sits in your wider job search Publishing content is about raising awareness and starting conversations with the right people. This can be your profile, written posts, newsletters, (bestselling) career breakdown kits, videos, you name it - anything you can become known for. In many ways the hierarchy of relationships your content appeals to is the same as with networking. Content can be publishing posts, commenting on the posts of others, sending direct messages. I’d argue even your applications and interviews are part of your personal brand. I think of LinkedIn posts like a plumber’s van driving around town. Most of the time you’ll disregard the van unless it cuts you up with noxious fumes. When you have a leaky pipe, you’ll surely take note of their number. It can support an application if a hiring manager decides to surreptitiously stalk your profile. And it can work against you if it suggests problem behaviour. A good balance for content is the poster in my daughters’ primary school from a few years back: THINK. Is it True? Is it Helpful? Is it Inspiring? Is it Necessary? Is it Kind? Achieve those five points and content will rarely work against your job search. Content should be consistent with your wider activity. Which means that everything people (potential employers) experience of you is a complementary and non-contradictory message. Content that contradicts your CV or cover letter may lead to red flags, whether that’s fair or not. Content should be intentional. HOW TO GO viral, and why you shouldn’t Anyone who writes content will enjoy the sweet, sweet flow of dopamine when you see reactions and comments trickle in. Such as that first flair post announcing you are available to help your next employer with examples of your achievements and what you are looking for. Do that and you’ll get loads of engagement. Why haven’t you done it yet? Tag me in and I’ll support you. Or you can do what most people do and say, ‘I’m sorry to announce I’ve lost my job, please help’ and that will get loads too. Because it is relevant and relatable to fellow job seekers, recruiters and sympathisers. Then you feel the soul-crushing defeat of a well-thought-out post, highlighting a problem in your industry, with tumbleweed to follow. Both types of content have a place. That tumbleweed post is relevant and relatable to a niche audience. I try to take a land and expand approach to content - job seeker advice, recruitment advice and stories, ponderings and satire, which I use to tackle topics from different directions. Over the past three years I’ve had between 3m to 11m views of my posts and I’ve gained a bit of business through them too. What I don’t do is try to go viral anymore. Because when I have gone viral with a few 1m impression posts, it’s taken weeks to extricate myself from them and there hasn’t been real benefit. I find my tumbleweed posts start better conversations from lurkers - those that never engage publicly. I promised you I’d show you how to go viral. Here you go. Relevance + relatability + readability + entitlement. Maybe add a selfie. If that seems too simple, search for this sentence on LinkedIn: “An employee asked me if he can WORK from HOME permanently.” You’ll need to use the double speech mark to search on the phrase, and rank by Posts. ‘Does it really work?’ asked Charles. I told him to try it as an experiment. He rarely got more than a few hundred impressions per post. 170,000 impressions, 2,000 reactions. Pretty viral for a first timer. It is the wrong path. What do these posts actually say? Who are they aimed at? And if they don’t appeal to people who can help you reach your objective, what’s the point? 

Nothing but the truth. Innovation from Iteration, pt 4

By Greg Wyatt • March 26, 2026
I was tempted to use another Tom Cruise AI image for this article, but his hands ended up looking like feet, which wasn't a true representation of him. Probably not fair to use AI in this way either, stealing copyrighted material without permission. And so I use this AI 'stock image' instead, which is probably also highly unethical, but feels more suitable and sufficient . Anyway here's an article about why the same principles are crucial for good recruitment: ‘True and Fair’ is an accountancy concept that lies at the heart of reporting, and can be applied effectively in recruitment. Its meaning is that any financial statement made about a company should accurately and completely represent its financial position and performance. The role of auditing is to confirm that documentation meets this definition. Do so and everyone knows what they are dealing with. HMRC, shareholders, customers, suppliers, employees – useful, and in many cases necessary, to have access to a true and fair view of a company’s accounts. Can something be true and not fair? In 2001, Enron went bust, a huge scandal with real-life repercussions that led to new legislation in the US. Their accounts were true, in that they conformed with the required laws and standards. However they had an incredibly complex reporting structure which made it impossible to see the overwhelming debt they had. Poof! Bye-bye a $100bn company when this all came out in the wash. How about fair but not true? This can happen if a situation is described which gives a fair picture but lacks accuracy. An example here could be the UK politician who HMRC deemed behaved fairly but made errors in his tax reporting. Only a few million quid plus penalty. What types of recruitment documentation does this apply to? Three key ones that spring to mind (although there’s no reason it can’t be applied everywhere): The job description. The job advertisement. The CV. If these three documents were always a true and fair representation of either a job or a candidate, you’d interview and hire better candidates who stick around longer. With the caveat that these documents should also be ‘suitable and sufficient’, if you remember last week's edition. Documents are the first step in a recruitment process, relating to a decision to apply and the decision to interview. Is it not the case, that the second most common complaint in recruitment is “not what we expected”? Therefore, if we nipped this complaint in the bud, with true and fair documentation, wouldn’t life be better for everyone in the recruitment process? What does true and fair mean in recruitment documentation? I think it has to cover three points. 1/ factually correct 2/ shows context suitably 3/ describes sufficiently An immediate objection might be that job descriptions are always true and fair, but I’d argue this is actually rarely the case. If you recruit for a new role, do you audit your job description against the current context? If you have a generic job family description does it show the specific day-to-day duties of a role? Have things changed in the current role that makes it different to the last time you recruited? A common scenario in recruitment is that Greg resigns, and the hiring manager says “we’d love someone just like Greg”. Yet if Greg resigned, wouldn’t someone just like Greg be at risk of resigning for the same reasons in future? Would now-Greg have applied for the same role that then-Greg applied for? Which definition of Greg is the true and fair one you’d hire? It feels strange writing my name like this. There are lots of different situations in which a job description that was true and fair a few years ago is no longer so. The only way to ensure it is true and fair, is to audit documentation prior to going live. You may think a fully representative and accurate contextual analysis is too time-consuming for most vacancies, especially where it doesn’t actually matter if there is some inaccuracy. “Oh yeah, that’s not relevant anymore”. But if you have a key hire that can make a difference in your business, ‘true and fair’ should be the starting point, each and every time. If you have a systematic process that finds truth and fairness, you’ll see the benefit of applying the same across any vacancy – for the reason that the time invested at the outset is offset by interviewing fewer unsuitable candidates and wasting less time and resources overall. And what should be the more important reason of better recruitment outcomes. For any project I take on, this is the first step – getting the documentation in order. Get it right and everything flows from there. It’s a key reason behind my nearly 100% fill rate. It’s also one of the reasons my average tenure is over 4 years for key hires. These achievements don’t come down to chance. They come from my process. If you've forgotten why suitability and sufficiency is the other pillar, here's an example that isn't suitable: Nineteen experiential bullet points might be true and fair but will also encourage ideal candidates to run away screaming. See you next time. Regards, Greg p.s. While you are here, if you like the idea of improving how you recruit, lack capacity or need better candidates, and are curious how I can help, these are my services: - commercial, operational and technical leadership recruitment (available for no more than two vacancies) - manage part or all of your recruitment on an individually designed basis for one client. This can be a large as end-to-end delivery of a programme of vacancies, or as small as writing one job advert for a key hire- recruitment strategy setting - outplacement support