LinkedIn profiles that convert

Greg Wyatt • April 13, 2026

What follows is Chapter 37 of A Career Breakdown Kit (2026).


I expect you've read and heard many arguments about how important is to have a discoverable LinkedIn profile - one where recruiters can find you for their vacancies, including the ones that aren't advertised.


Indeed, when you hit the market, your LinkedIn profile is one of the first activities you should try and get right - because your job search can optimise for inbound leads before you think about anything else.


Yet a lot of the focus is on getting found, and there's a consequence to this that I think is worse than not getting found at all: the recruiter who reads your profile for an ideal vacancy and decides not to contact you.


And because Recruiter Licence accesses your data in a different way to the platform you use, you'll never know.


So this Chapter is the direct follow up to LinkedIn Profiles that Get Found, one which aims to convert an invisible reader to someone that contacts you for legitimate reasons. I'm going to be updating that chapter soon, with some additional findings, such as why your headline doesn't carry quite as much weight as you might think.


I should point out, as a recruiter I am quite happy for you to have a weak profile, given it means I am more likely to find you through rigour, if others rely on well specified information.


For example tomorrow I will be setting up an interview for someone who has 1 LinkedIn connection and only a job title and company name - nothing else. He came up for me because his job title matched my search, and I used an industry term in the "Company Name" section - an approach that is common for employers in that niche industry.


But as I always say - it's better to help the weakest link in the chain see you as a viable candidate because same work helps everyone.


37 - LinkedIn profiles that convert


An Amazon (job) search


When I buy a commodity item on Amazon there are two stages to my buying process.


I know what I want and I have to find an acceptable shortlist of possibilities. Only then do I assess and decide on what to buy.


As a sweaty runner that clocks up 50-60km a week, I burn through Bluetooth headphones regularly.


I’m also deaf in one ear and can’t tell the difference in higher quality sound.


My context is a little different to the normal buyer although likely no more different than most buyers are from each other.


A search on ‘Bluetooth headphones’ brings up over 2,000 results, which is hardly manageable. I change the search to ‘waterproof Bluetooth headphones’, and filter by:


£15-£30, in ear, Prime, running.


125 results. Much better.


Now I scan down the list and I ignore Sponsored. I’m not sure why.


Click on the first one with a relevant headline promising 50hrs playtime and skim past all the marketing twaddle. Who cares what they say - what do their buyers think?


I go straight to the three-star reviews because they are generally good with caveats.


One of the three-star reviews says they were offered a discount to change it to five. That’s BS that turns me right off.


I click through a few more products and buy one. The decent guarantee swung it for me.


I didn’t get past the first 40 results.


Now think about your own commodity purchases, where you have to do differing levels of research to get what you need.


What kind of search criteria do you use?


How do you filter?


What informs your decision to buy?


Perhaps you already know what you want to buy, having researched buyer guides, YouTube videos and user forums, and are just sourcing the best price.


Or maybe you need something adequate, and literally anything above an acceptable threshold will do - 5 minutes and done.


These are examples of a buyer’s journey across a transactional process.


Which isn’t far removed from how recruiters might search for candidates.


On LinkedIn and other channels.


Bringing it back to your job search


LinkedIn and Amazon - what’s the difference?


In a hiring process, they are both volume, transactional marketplaces that allow searches and filters to create an appropriate shortlist to read through.


As with a product on Amazon, your LinkedIn profile is one of many that fit similar criteria and might be found at any stage in a recruitment process.


  • From a search through the Recruiter Licence
  • A hiring manager reading more on a shortlisted candidate
  • Their boss researching you at final interview
  • Out of curiosity from a comment or post you wrote
  • Checking it out on receipt of an application
  • Because you were recommended
  • Because you worked at a certain company


In the same way customers might visit a product page on Amazon, so too might someone hiring visit your profile.


This means that it doesn’t have to just stand on its own merits, it has to corroborate and support any other documentation a reader might have come across:


  • Your CV or application
  • Your LinkedIn posts and comments
  • Something you did that’s in the public domain - an interview, video, article


Where there’s a conflict, such as an overly customised CV that contradicts your LinkedIn profile - that can be a problem.


Assuming your contents all support each other, the aim is to prompt an action.


Unlike an Amazon purchase, you aren’t expecting a sale, simply for the right people to start a conversation that meets your goals.


To convert interest into an action, first, you have to be found.


Think about an Amazon product page and the process you go through to buy - what do you typically read and in which order?


It’s probably something like <home page - search - list of product headlines>. My reading journey on a product page is <headline - price - delivery - three star reviews - buy now>.


How does your profile page cater to the reading psychology of a recruiter?


While a recruiter likely has access to the Recruiter Licence, you won’t. I’ll write this in a way you can emulate as a standard or Premium Member.


A standard search might go across <home page - search - list of profile headlines>. Leading to this reading priority of someone who wants to read everything (!):


  • #Open to Work banner (your choice)
  • Headline
  • Banner
  • Location / Contact details (depending on connection and privacy settings)
  • Activity / Featured Section / About (the order depends on whether you have Creator mode or not)
  • Experience
  • Education
  • Projects
  • Skills
  • Recommendations


Unlike Amazon reviews, I rarely look at recommendations - if I’m still interested by that point, I’ll get in touch.


You can also download your profile as a PDF, which looks like a CV with contact details, headline, summary and experience.


In both your profile and the downloadable PDF, your headline and summary / About section are going to be read before your experience is.


This is where a lot of the decision to contact you will come from.


While the career section is important, if an attention-short reader doesn’t get that far, it won’t help convert interest.


An exercise to guide your approach to updating your profile


Imagine you have been promoted and are tasked with recruiting your replacement.


The rules are that you are only allowed to search for candidates on LinkedIn through your standard membership.


You have 10 minutes to run and scan through a search and 20 minutes to form a shortlist of 3 top candidates from the results.


Location and salary don’t matter for now.


It’s likely you’ll search on your job titles, job specific skills and qualifications.


What do the results look like?


Pick your three favourite profiles from the results.


Now compare them against your own profile, step by step.


Would you make your own shortlist based purely on the content?


If not, what is it about their profiles that is preferable and how can you emulate the same in yours?


What is it in their content that has converted you from being a passive reader to having them on your imaginary shortlist?


Actionable points to update your profile (and CV too)


You want people with hiring authority to look at your profile and want to contact you.


How can you help them see you as a candidate of choice?


1.     A punchy headline that says what you do and how you can help. The first four words count - those Amazon product headlines. If you don’t read further than the first four words, you’ll never know what you missed. Check out how other people’s headlines look on your mobile phone when on their profile or if they are replying to a comment on a post - lead with relevance

2.     Scrap ‘I help companies by’ because it’s meaningless. Start with your job title then add a flourish or context. ‘CTO - deep tech scale-up. Equity backed and privately owned. £20m to £120m in three years’

3.     Your banner - it’s free advertising real estate. Use Canva; include your contact details in case a reader doesn’t have access through your account

4.     Make it easy to contact you by phone or email. Put it in multiple spots

5.     About section - who do you help and how? What are your key skills and achievements? Keep it concise and focused on your ideal audience - move away from the ‘responsibilities led’ approach to CVs that get copied onto LinkedIn. Show context

6.     While your career section is further down and may not even be read, it should still be fully populated and credible

7.     How can you highlight posts, videos and articles to support your candidacy? The Featured Section is a useful facility in Creator mode

8.     Keywords. Recruiters search on keywords. Remember all the job adverts and required skills you’ve read - does your LinkedIn profile show these suitably? While these need to be true how might differing acronyms and terminology mean the same thing?

9.     Personal branding. How can you showcase your personality in your words? Your About Section is a form of elevator pitch. While it highlights your professional credibility you can also show your personal qualities. What are you most passionate about or best at? Lead with that

10.  It’s not about you. It’s about the needs of your reader - tell us what we need to know to make an informed decision on your candidacy. Answer the questions that we should have through your content

11.  Keep it simple and authentic

12.  If there’s something you want us to know, make it clear. This could be anything from the job you want, to part-time status, to highlighting a recommendation you are proud of


I've mentioned ‘CV too’ because the same principles that let you get found apply in all of your documentation - such as on an ATS, on a job board, or with a referral. And because an optimised LinkedIn profile is a further reason why you might not customise your CV (p178).


By Greg Wyatt April 30, 2026
I'm thrilled to announce the publication of A Recruitment AiDE. A guide, philosophy and discipline for effective key hire recruitment. The timing’s perfect, given the deluge of AI content that floods our feeds. Imagine how these similarly produced generic adverts land with people you want to talk to. "We're thrilled to announce we want, we need, here’s our shopping list, why aren’t you responding and oh what’s this flood of AI CVs?" It doesn’t have to be this way. This has taken twenty-five years of hard graft - talking to job seekers, researching the market and recruitment practice, learning about candidate resentment, problem awareness, marketing, copywriting, and the psychology of what moves people. With the evidence that backs this up. The result is something that may make you rethink your approach to recruitment. That will improve the number of qualified candidates, while reducing the total number of applications. It's too early to prove, but my expectation is this will reduce the number of AI CVs too, given there is less for AI to grab when you speak to professional identity. You’ll have to be bold, go against the grain, do something that feels counterintuitive, especially if someone has their hand on your shoulder saying "This isn't the company style!" But then, what does it take to stand out from the crowd? And if you really want to attract the best people, shouldn’t your first step be focused on them, and not you? Kindle version out now. Here's the link: https://amzn.eu/d/03idlAVM.  Paperback in two weeks. If you don’t like Evilcorp, let me know and we can work something out.
By Greg Wyatt April 27, 2026
What follows is Chapter 40 of A Career Breakdown Kit , and part two of a three part series on Personal Branding. Except it isn't. There are various definitions I revolt against, with good reason, in a job search. Personal branding, hidden jobs markets, ATS compliance, and all the others. Terms that seem to hide secret wins, not replicable steps, especially when hidden behind a paywall. I call it the title that's expected because of the questions job seekers ask me. You may recall my article on the Hidden Jobs Market breaks it apart and rebuilds it into a cohesive multichannel marketing strategy that allows you to access the whole of your jobs market. And so it is with my personal branding series. This isn't about your brand. Or even about your reputation. It's about pushing content that starts conversations with relevant people - such as peers, former colleagues, recruiters with a vested interest in these content areas, and even people that can put you closer to a job. Not forgetting fellow job seekers you can share experiences with - as long as you don't dwell on the negative. And it's also about writing in a way that is both true to you and your profession - because conversation has to follow in the same voice as you write, and should support your work, when in work. It's a strategy and philosophy that mirrors earlier chapters on networking, doorknocking, getting found and converting interest. It isn't about writing credible statements in a content savvy way that shares unprovable anecdotes, hacks that lack substance, and where a funnel means more than a lesson. That way is the way of social media marketing - this is about conversations that matter. 40 - Content strategy and philosophy While a personal brand might be the goal, your content strategy should be the priority. It can be applied even if you don’t like the idea of branding. Much is made about LinkedIn’s algorithm and how you need to do this that and the other to get engagement. You can look at it differently, ignoring the algorithm on the whole, and still achieve much the same. These are the outcomes I aim for and see when writing content: Start conversations Help others Sharpen and spark ideas Raise awareness and trust Have a laugh and a chat I’ve gained friends I’ve never spoken to and friendly acquaintances I only know through ‘comments.’ As well as paying clients who have benefitted from my service. Just as importantly, I have more credibility with candidates who place weight on LinkedIn content. Content makes it easier for me to start conversations. It’s important for me that I either enjoy the content and its consequences or find it fulfilling. I don’t talk openly about my personal life, family or challenges. Something I agreed with my wife when I started publishing content. Instead, I show all of myself in my words - quirks and all. So that if we ever speak in real life, there isn’t much of a disconnect. Start with other people’s content Find content writers who inspire you and use them as a catalyst for your own words. There are two ways to do this. Firstly, if you’re thinking about writing on LinkedIn, you are presumably already reading content. What inspires you? What do you enjoy reading? Which authors resonate with your career, your values, your goals and the problems you solve? When you read their content, do you engage and comment? Do you connect with them? Do you ask them who they recommend as writers in your field? Secondly, look within. What do you want to be known for in your career? Maybe it’s procurement or your CIPD membership. React or agile. 5 Whys or Gemba. If these are areas that interest you, use the LinkedIn search bar to find posts on these topics. Now filter the results by ‘Posts’ and ‘Sort by’ latest. Read through the results both for posts that interest you and those that have high engagement (less likely on a niche topic). When you’ve found inspiring content, what next ? One first step in content creation is to respond to these posts with your own ideas. Less ‘Agree’ and more how you might respond in a real-life conversation on this topic. Commenting on other people’s posts is a good way to find your voice, particularly if the conversation continues. Like any skill, writing takes practice, and comments are a low-friction way of developing your tone. If a comment sparks interest from other readers, it can be a concept to build on as a post in its own right. The other benefit of this kind of niche content is that those who engage are likely to have similar interests to you. Make sure to read other comments and see if there are more conversations to be had. The comments you build with them can be the start of a mutually beneficial relationship. Check out their profiles - do their interests and values reflect yours? These are people to connect with, then DM to continue the conversation. Check out their posting history, which will be available on their profile - there may well be a lot of interesting content to absorb. With conversation comes content. Ideas and discussion that grow are an effective way to share your voice. Here’s a suggestion for how you can do this in practice: Look for 5 posts daily that interest you professionally - manually, using a search, or checking what your valuable connections are up to Engage and comment on each Check out new relevant profiles - connect and follow their content On each post, look at who is engaging and respond naturally Try to connect with 5 new relevant people from these interactions Perhaps follow up with a message Take note of the most interesting conversations and at the end of the week pick at least one to inspire your own posts You don’t need to publish them if you aren’t comfortable - save for later if not I’d avoid the viral content that combines relevance + relatability + entitlement + readability. These writers are more interested in engagement numbers than your specific interest. You can see the truth of their words in how they respond in the comments sections. From a marketing perspective, different types of content have different places in your lead generation: Awareness Interest Consideration Evaluation Purchase Each post, comment, DM and real-life conversation can relate to these steps and support your goals, even if you aren’t treating these as a marketing activity. Time and time again There’s a lot of investigation into optimal times to post. It’s more important that you are available to reply attentively in the first hour. The course of a post is often dictated by the performance during this time. I actively reply to comments for around an hour a day with LinkedIn on in the background of other work. How much time can you set aside per week and per day for content? Even if you only write a couple of posts a week, this will probably take a couple of hours. You can expect low performance initially, with some exceptions, as it takes time to build inertia. Set aside a sustainable amount of time each week and commit to it over a period - try for 10-12 weeks and track how things have developed. You may find it becomes an enjoyable task. Try not to get distracted by engagement for its own sake and keep your goals in mind. Types of content to try Engagement on LinkedIn is built primarily on relevance and relatability. Even ragebait, given it drives strong feeling. You can write a 100% relatable post that everyone takes relevance from and see massive engagement. Though that engagement may not serve your goals. Or you can write a post that is 100% relevant to the problems you solve in your career, and the people who will find it relevant are from a small niche facing the same problems. This is why a photo of you with your dog will fly, while a carefully thought out post about the optimisation of widgets in a byzantine setting will appear to be shouting into a void. Or you can blend the two through storytelling, pivoting observations into business content, and copywriting formulae like AIDA (attention interest desire action) and PAS (problem agitation solution). Everyone will have different forms of content that will be effective for them. What do you want your ideal readers to experience? What would ‘you five years ago’ would find helpful? Do you want readers to see you as a credible expert? Someone who is authentically vulnerable? Your warts and all personality? Someone who stands out in a sea of competition? Someone who is thought-provoking, helpful, or altruistic? The answers are much the same if you posed these questions of interviewing. This is no coincidence, given your message should be consistently delivered no matter where it is received. With that in mind, here are some content ideas you can try: How you might solve a problem specific to your industry Stories from your everyday life The challenges in your job search Observations on a news story and how it relates to your work A flair post highlighting your availability Asking for thoughts on an idea you are interested in Sharing insight you find fascinating, whether that’s films, video games, science or sport Stories from your career where you can show growth (everyone loves a hero’s journey) Business frameworks, processes and techniques you find useful - Pomodoro Technique, scientific method, STAR, what do you use? Equipment you use for work Developments in your workplace and culture Thoughts on content you find inspiring Memes, humour, satire Google content ideas for LinkedIn or ask ChatGPT, Claude and others. I wouldn’t use AI to write articles. I do use them for ideation and to sense check. ‘Write me a post for LinkedIn that shows the link between Tesla cars and how to develop an HR strategy.’ The vulnerability of writing You can be a content creator without ever publishing a post if you continue conversations through comments, connections, DMs and real-life. This avoids sticking your head above the parapets and is low risk, but misses the gain of publishing your own content. I know that some people are held back for fear of failure. I can tell you that clicking ‘send’ is always a high point of anxiety for me in sending newsletters. Imagine how I felt when I clicked Publish for this book. What’s the worst that can happen with a carefully thought-out post? Tumbleweed? If no one reads it, you can always post it again another time. Disagreement? Loads of people disagree on my posts - you’ll see from my comments that I am always constructive in my dialogue and typically this supports the intent of my post. Everyone has an opinion and they are welcome to theirs - as long as it’s constructive, there is always a learning opportunity. Trolls? These people exist and will at some point rear their ugly heads. I imagine them naked on the Underground, which takes the sting out of their vitriol. I’m sure it’s their unhappiness that drives their behaviour. Marriage requests? Unfortunately, dubious and toxic behaviour isn’t uncommon. Don’t be afraid to block and report if you receive harmful messages. As long as you are constructive in what you write and you work to build a conversation, it’s unlikely anything bad will happen. You will open yourself up to the opportunity of new relevant people starting conversations with you: hiring managers, recruiters, peers, fellow job seekers, and friendly strangers. Weight and depth of opinion A couple of years ago, I had a message from an out-of-work Sales Director asking for some feedback. He’d shot a video for LinkedIn where he talked about why he should be snapped up and received a lot of praise for the post. However, he was confused because a CEO he trusts told him it was poor and made him look boring. He knew I’d give him unvarnished feedback, which was what he needed to find some clarity on what had happened. Truthfully, the CEO was correct. What had happened? All of the positive engagement was from fellow job seekers and people who wanted to support him. That he’d done it was praiseworthy in itself and was rightly celebrated, rather than the quality of what he had produced. None of them had hiring authority or were in a career similar to someone who would be his line manager. The video didn’t show him how he comes across in person either. While the positive feedback was fantastic for validation, his video worked against him. What might happen if a hiring process thought his video was boring when the role being recruited for has persuasion as a key requirement? I’m pleased to say his redo was excellent, showing off his charisma while delivering the same message. Who can you rely on to be this CEO for you in your career? Why you should start now, even if you don’t see any benefit for months. Starting cold on LinkedIn can take time to get traction. When your first post bombs you might never think to do a second. Going in with the expectation of little impact for the first three to six months is healthy in making a sustainable habit. If you’re out of work though, three to six months may seem too far off to be worthwhile when there are many activities that offer a quick turnaround, such as applying for jobs. I’ve spoken to many job seekers who’ve been out of work for more than six months and had decided not to write content at the outset of their search. If they had, they might now be seeing the benefit of their work.